Most Scandalous Trials of the Century   - The Sad Story of Who's Who Worldwide
Thomas FX Dunn once again displays the poorest level of skills as a lawer, proving himself to be among the worst attorneys in history



                   

Seventy thousand - CEO's, C.O.O.'s, Chairman of the Boards, and Presidents of the Fortune 3000
A generation's best and brightest victimized by a total news media blackout

1700 Who's Who organizations in the USA.   Marquis Who's Who ruled the roost for 100 yrs.
Along came Who's Who Worldwide running past Marquis, creating an executive club.
Reed Elsevier, foreign owners of Marquis, Lexis Nexis, Martindale-Hubbell, etc., did not like being second-best,
so the goal was to crush the largest executive club ever created: Who's Who Worldwide Registry.


Can you explain never hearing about this impressively dirty trial, one of our longest federal trials?
With a corrupt postal inspector and more, they succeeded.
70,000 top executives lost their investment.    Not a whisper in the media.     A news blackout.


              One Amazing Story... Dirty Trials... ... Scandal... ...news blackouts ... and more ..             


  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  





Most Scandalous Trials of the Century -Justice Screwed, Blued, and Tattooed

How rare it is to find a case that can offer not merely two or three, instead, more than a dozen major reasons for overturning that conviction.
Here is a case studied by a respected federal judge for many months, who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case.

Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the single richest and most powerful publisher in more than one hundred countries around the world,
easily. empirically and truthfully described as one of the most corrupt corporations in all of human history,
perverted the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash, power, and perqs.

Imagine a trial where not ten percent of the proceedings have ANY connection with most of the defendants.
That alone should require a separation of trial. In this case, NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings,
accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants.

The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant,
and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman."

For days and days and weeks and weeks, all the discussion was about Gordon and his actions.
Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, yet,
this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study,
was under one of the worst pressures any judge can be subjected to:
pressure from the federal court of appeals above him, who, in
New York's bailiwick, remains under the control of....
Reed Elsevier, the most powerful force today
in the American arena of jurisprudence.

This can be fixed by Presidential Pardon.
Call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.